agt_spooky: (SN-Sam and Dean (wicked))
[personal profile] agt_spooky
This just in from TVGuide.com, via Eric Kripke...




Supernatural Brings Back Meg
by Ileane Rudolph June 30, 2009 10:39 AM EST

For those who’ve been wondering what happened to Meg, the sassy demon with a huge grudge against Supernatural’s Winchester brothers, she’s back! And Rachel Miner, the former Mrs. Macaulay Culkin, who got her start on Guiding Light and was most recently seen as a bisexual S&M practicing character on Californication, is playing the character, last seen in Season 2. “I’ve been wondering, what Meg’s doing out there,” creator Eric Kripke tells TV Guide Magazine exclusively. “I’ve been continually asking the writers, ‘Where’s Meg?” She’s would make a really formidable adversary. I got impatient and ended up writing her into my own script.” So far, Miner’s been signed for one episode.

~~~~~

So I guess that casting call for Meg we saw a week or so ago was indeed real!

But...that photo of Miner at TVGuide's site...she looks like she's twelve years old. Personally, I think she's got HUGE shoes to fill, because Nicki was AMAZING as Meg, and I'm not really sure I'm keen on another actress playing that character.

What do you guys think? Glad to see Meg back in another body, or should we have seen the last of Meg with Nicki?


free web hit counter

free invisible web counter

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-01 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agt-spooky.livejournal.com
Meg without Nicki playing her might not be the Meg we knew and loved/hated.

That's what I'm afraid of. Because I loved Nicki's version of Meg. I guess I'm wondering why we need to bring Meg back again. It's like Eric has a compulsion to always have a female demon on the show.

This will be an interesting part for her.

I really hope she's got the chops to pull off being a demon, because IMO, Katie and Genevieve surely couldn't. And she needs to act like Nicki did, not a complete 180 turn around in attitude like when we went from Katie's Ruby to Genevieve's Ruby.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-01 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinjinh1.livejournal.com
Yeah the differences between Kaite's Ruby and Genevieve's Ruby was too drastic. Of course, I never trusted Ruby to begin with. Maybe Rachel will keep Meg close to what Nicki did with her. Depends how they write her this time.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-02 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agt-spooky.livejournal.com
Of course, I never trusted Ruby to begin with.

Geez, me, either! Not from day one! So many people were convinced that she was a good demon, but I never bought it for a second.

Depends how they write her this time

Very true. If they don't keep the dialogue true to Nicki's version it's not gonna work.
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 07:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios