agt_spooky: (SN-Jensen (take my breath away))
agt_spooky ([personal profile] agt_spooky) wrote2008-07-14 02:35 pm
Entry tags:

Supernatural letter in TV Guide

Just got my new TV Guide in the mail today and this was in the Letters column:

Ok, people, really? This is the second time that you've done a sexiest/hottest body type issue and have included Supernatural's Jared Padalecki but not Jensen Ackles. That boy is smokin' hot! Get it right next time!

T. Berrios
New Bedford, MA



Hee! Let's hear it for the Jensen love! Why couldn't we have BOTH boys in the same issue, eh? Probably because it would spontaneously combust in people's hands! :-)

[identity profile] black-regalia.livejournal.com 2008-07-14 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG! Someone picked Padalecki over Ackles for their "hottest" article. I'm afraid I don't get the Ackles love. I'm not saying he's not pretty -- he is. But it's like looking at a very nicely made piece of art. I don't want to hump it.

As opposed to Padalecki, which I find has the raw, animal magnetism for me. Rawr.

It always makes me sad that I see Ackles voted up EVERYWHERE and Padalecki gets no love :( This chick just needs to look at any website ever and she'll be appeased.

[identity profile] almightyspaz.livejournal.com 2008-07-14 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Its very simple. You put both boys in the same issue, and there will be over a million fangirls dead from squeeing so much that they forgot to breathe.

Honestly, why did they forget Jensen? It seems so strange. Heh, they forgot Barrowman too so oh well. I never get too over worked about things like these. I look at this way, if one of the guys is in a thing like this, then that means exposure for the show and more fangirls come which means higher ratings and finally CSI can sink its little ship!

[identity profile] khek.livejournal.com 2008-07-15 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Good letter!

I don't see why they couldn't have put both of them in the issue. It's not like they said they could only do one person from each show...there are several people from mainstream (and overrated) shows like Grey's Anatomy and Desperate Housewives every year.

[identity profile] andromakhe001.livejournal.com 2008-07-15 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
What article was this? I don't remember another one.

That being said, they are stupid to not include Jensen. They probably don't because he doesn't do "beefcake" shots much anymore. Not that I blame him. Most other actors have to "sell" their looks, Jensen has to try and play them down because he's lost roles because people think "pretty boy". Male models usually have hot bodies too, it doesn't mean they can act so I think at this point Jensen tries not to do anything encourages seeing him as a "hunk"(which after all, I think comes from the phrase "hunk of meat", aka hot body).

Still that's good for Jensen but I want to see him included in "sexiest issues". LOL
ext_16595: (Default)

[identity profile] tracys-dream.livejournal.com 2008-07-15 06:58 am (UTC)(link)
I think Jensen's totally gorgeous. His body, his eyes, lips, nose and his hair all are effortlessly beautiful.
And his acting blows me away.
Hurry up September!

[identity profile] hermitme.livejournal.com 2008-07-15 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)

Agt Spooky; I'm with you girl. Jensen should have been included and while Jared fans find him hot, I really don't. I think he's cute, but that's where it ends. I see no animal magnetism with Jared, but I do see Sex on Legs with Jensen. The man is just Sex personified. It's too bad that tv guide has blinders on, but looking at their other choices, I can see that top of the line isn't always their preferences.