Watercooler review of Born Under a Bad Sign from tvguide.com

So.

Wow.

Do we or do we not watch the BEST FREAKING SHOW ON TV, people??

I'm honestly still trying to process everything that happened last night. It was so damn intense and hurt SO DAMN BAD.

So without further ado, here is Tina Charles's review of Born Under a Bad Sign, followed by my comments...

( If it's the last thing I do, I'm going to save you )

New Jensen and Jared interview in MediaBlvd.com

This is making it's rounds, but I thought I'd share if anyone hadn't seen it - a new interview with Jensen and Jared that's really, really good.

Love this part from Jensen: . I don’t think the show would have succeeded the way that it has, had he and I not bonded the way we did.

All together now.. "Awwww....!"

And this was really interesting to me: Occasionally, we work out together, but we live in two different hotels, so he usually works out in the lobby of his hotel, and I work out in the lobby of my hotel

Wha--? They're still living in HOTELS? After two years neither of them have rented an apartment or anything?? Wow, that's something new to incorporate into my next RPS fic!

Anyway, here's the direct link and the full text of the article is under the cut. No real spoilers besides the name of a guest star that I think everyone knows about anyway.

MediaBlvd interview

( Supernatural Stars Flattered by Fan Devotion )

Ratings for Born Under a Bad Sign

From Marc Berman at the Programming Insider:

Rounding off the 9 p.m. hour were Fox’s soon-to-conclude The O.C. (Viewers: 3.57 million; A18-49: 1.6/ 4) and the CW's Supernatural (Viewers: 2.83 million; A18-49: 1.2/ 3), which disappointed with retention out of Smallville of 61 percent in total viewers and 67 percent among adults 18-49. Sorry, Supernatural, but competing The O.C.’s advantage of 740,000 viewers and 33 percent among adults 18-49 makes you a loser this week.

Half hour breakdown:

9:00 p.m. V: 2.95 million, A18-49: 1.2/ 3
9:30 p.m. V: 2.71 million, A18-49: 1.1/ 3

~~~~~

Wow, I'm totally stunned. Last night's episode was incredible! And to only score 2.83 million??

Last week we had 3.34 million, so this is a complete disappointment. :-( Wasn't there supposed to be some huge episode of Grey's on last night? I wonder if that affected our ratings.

And in comparision, here's how the other CW shows did this week, along with some comments from Marc, which I thought folks would be interested in as well:

Smallville: 4.67 million
Gilmore Girls: 4.62 million
(To the fans -- or non-fans -- of Gilmore Girls debating whether the show should return next season, note that it’s year-ago performance on the WB was a heftier 5.40 million viewers with a 2.4/ 6 among adults 18-49 (and that was also opposite American Idol). I vote to let Gilmore Girls exit while it still has some dignity left.)
Beauty and the Geek: 4.39 million
Everybody Hates Chris: 3.15 million
(which remains down by double-digit percentages year-to-year from its former Thursday 8 p.m. time period)
One Tree Hill: 2.85 million
All of Us: 2.74 million
(After three low-rated seasons, isn’t it time for the CW to swing the axe on All of Us?)
Girlfriends: 2.72 million
The Game: 2.66 million
Veronica Mars: 2.47 million
(with retention out of Gilmore Girls of just 53 percent in viewers and 55 percent in the demo). Year-ago WB occupant Supernatural averaged 4.27 million viewers and a 1.9/ 4 among adults 18-49. Sorry folks, but this certainly does not make Veronica Mars worthy of a fourth season renewal.)

~~~~

Very sad that we didn't even beat One Tree Hill this week. :-(